<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article article-type="normal" xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PALEVO</journal-id>
         <issn>1631-0683</issn>
         <publisher>
            <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
         </publisher>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(07)00102-9</article-id>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crpv.2007.09.006</article-id>
         <article-categories>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="type">
               <subject>Research article</subject>
            </subj-group>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
               <subject>Systematic Palaeontology (Palaeobotany)</subject>
            </subj-group>
         </article-categories>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>Mycorrhization of fossil and living plants</article-title>
            <trans-title-group xml:lang="fr">
               <trans-title>La mycorrhization des plantes fossiles et actuelles</trans-title>
            </trans-title-group>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="editors">
            <contrib contrib-type="editor">
               <name>
                  <surname>Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>Jean Broutin, Armand de</given-names>
               </name>
               <email/>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="authors">
            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu-Derrien</surname>
                  <given-names>Christine</given-names>
               </name>
               <email>christine.strullu-derrien@univ-angers.fr</email>
               <xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>a</sup>
               </xref>
               <xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>b</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu</surname>
                  <given-names>Désiré-Georges</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>a</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff1">
               <aff>
                  <label>a</label> Laboratoire Mycorhizes, UFR Sciences, université d’Angers, 2, boulevard Lavoisier, 49045 Angers cedex, France</aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff2">
               <aff>
                  <label>b</label> ‘Paléobotanique, paléopalynologie et micropaléontologie’, département de géologie, université de Liège, 4000 Liège 1, Belgium</aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
         </contrib-group>
         <pub-date-not-available/>
         <volume>6</volume>
         <issue seq="13">6-7</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(07)X0038-1</issue-id>
         <issue-title>La paléobotanique et l'évolution du monde végétal : quelques problèmes d'actualité</issue-title>
         <issue-title xml:lang="en">Palaeobotany and evolution of the plant's world: some current problems</issue-title>
         <fpage seq="0" content-type="normal">483</fpage>
         <lpage content-type="normal">494</lpage>
         <history>
            <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2007-09-14"/>
            <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2007-09-20"/>
         </history>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2007 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
            <copyright-year>2007</copyright-year>
            <copyright-holder>Académie des sciences</copyright-holder>
         </permissions>
         <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="application/pdf" xlink:href="main.pdf">
                        Full (PDF)
                    </self-uri>
         <abstract abstract-type="author">
            <p>The widespread mycorrhization together with the fossil record indicate that plants and fungi have evolved in mycorrhizal relationship since the colonization of land by early plants. In living plants most mycorrhizal symbioses are mutualistic associations in which fungus and plant exchange metabolites and nutrients required for their growth and survival. They concern either the gametophyte and/or the sporophyte of most embryophytes. A new nomenclature is suggested to define two types of mycorrhizae: (1) paramycorrhizae for the colonization of thalli and shoot systems: (2) eumycorrhizae for the colonization of root systems. The aim of this paper is to show the mycorrhizal status in relation with the various clades of embryophytes by considering both fossil and living plants and to develop the implications of mycorrhizal symbiosis in the colonization of land by early plants and in the evolution of plants.</p>
         </abstract>
         <trans-abstract abstract-type="author" xml:lang="fr">
            <p>Les enregistrements fossiles et la mycorhization, aujourd’hui largement répandue, montrent que les plantes entretiennent des relations étroites avec les champignons depuis la colonisation de la Terre par les plantes primitives. Chez les plantes actuelles, la majorité des symbioses mycorhiziennes sont des associations de type mutualiste, à partir desquelles la plante et le champignon échangent les éléments nutritifs nécessaires à leur croissance et à leur développement. La symbiose mycorhizienne est présente au niveau du gamétophyte et/ou du sporophyte chez la plupart des embryophytes. Une nouvelle nomenclature est proposée pour définir deux types de mycorhizes : (1) paramycorhizes pour la colonisation des thalles et des systèmes caulinaires ; (2) eumycorhizes pour la colonisation des systèmes racinaires. Cette note a pour but de montrer le statut mycorhizien des embryophytes dans les différents clades, en prenant en compte les taxons fossiles et actuels. Les implications de la symbiose mycorhizienne dans la colonisation du milieu terrestre par les plantes primitives, ainsi que dans l’évolution des plantes, sont ensuite présentées.</p>
         </trans-abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <unstructured-kwd-group>Mycorrhizae, Nomenclature, Embryophytes, Colonization of land</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <kwd-group xml:lang="fr">
            <unstructured-kwd-group>Mycorhizes, Nomenclature, Embryophytes, Colonisation du milieu terrestre</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <custom-meta-group>
            <custom-meta>
               <meta-name>presented</meta-name>
               <meta-value>Written on invitation of the Editorial Board</meta-value>
            </custom-meta>
         </custom-meta-group>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body>
      <sec>
         <label>1</label>
         <title>Introduction</title>
         <p>Mycorrhizae represent symbiotic associations between plants and fungi based on the exchange of metabolites and nutrients. Today the term symbiosis describes a mutualistic association that is beneficial to both partners for a significant period of time <xref rid="bib46" ref-type="bibr">[46]</xref>. More than 90% of the living embryophytes (land plants) are capable of forming a mycorrhizal symbiosis, and a non-mycorrhizal status is an exception. Mycorrhization occurs in root systems as well as in thalli and shoot systems, depending on the type of plants.</p>
         <p>Embryophytes arose from green algae, which became semi-aquatic and then terrestrial. The transition from an aqueous to a gaseous medium exposed plants to new physical conditions. On land, plants encountered a harsh environment; they were subject to desiccation and the soil was poor in nutrients. On the other hand, life on land implied a greater volume of space and little competition to disperse, associated with high levels of CO<sub>2</sub> and light intensity for photosynthesis.</p>
         <p>It is considered that fungal symbiosis played a key role in the original colonization of land by early plants <xref rid="bib59" ref-type="bibr">[59]</xref>. Observing the organisms in the Rhynie Chert (400 million years old), Kindston and Lang <xref rid="bib36" ref-type="bibr">[36]</xref> found the fungi they described to be most similar to extant mycorrhizal fungi. Later, unequivocal evidence for the occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizae in early land plants in the Rhynie chert was given by several authors <xref rid="bib8" ref-type="bibr">[8]</xref>, <xref rid="bib63" ref-type="bibr">[63]</xref> and <xref rid="bib85" ref-type="bibr">[85]</xref>. More recently, ectomycorrhizae have also been observed from the Eocene of British Columbia and from the Eocene of Belgium <xref rid="bib21" ref-type="bibr">[21]</xref> and <xref rid="bib41" ref-type="bibr">[41]</xref>. In this paper, we present the mycorrhizal status in relation with the various clades of embryophytes, including fossil and living plants; the implications of mycorrhization in colonization of land, soil functioning and plant production are suggested.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <label>2</label>
         <title>Mycorrhizal symbiosis</title>
         <sec>
            <p>It has been a long time since mycorrhizae interested mycologists and plant scientists. In 1885, Frank <xref rid="bib25" ref-type="bibr">[25]</xref> developed a new theory of tree nutrition via symbiosis between fungi and tree root and gave the name ‘mycorrhiza’ to the organ he observed. Two years later, he suggested the terms ectotrophic for the mycorrhiza that presented a mantle and endotrophic for those without a mantle. Anatomical descriptions of what are most certainly arbuscular mycorrhizae are given by many researchers; among them, Janse <xref rid="bib32" ref-type="bibr">[32]</xref> and Gallaud <xref rid="bib26" ref-type="bibr">[26]</xref> described respectively ‘vésicules’ as the intraradical spores and ‘arbuscules’ as the intracellular structures. Two basic classes of mycorrhizae were also suggested by Gallaud <xref rid="bib26" ref-type="bibr">[26]</xref>: the ‘Arum’ and ‘Paris’ types, named after the type of host plant in which they occur. The ‘Arum’ type <xref rid="bib11" ref-type="bibr">[11]</xref> and <xref rid="bib73" ref-type="bibr">[73]</xref> shows an extensive intercellular phase of hyphal growth before penetration into the cortical cells and development of arbuscules. The ‘Paris’ type <xref rid="bib73" ref-type="bibr">[73]</xref> and <xref rid="bib80" ref-type="bibr">[80]</xref> is defined by the absence of the intercellular phase and intracellular growth of the fungus with formation of coils, sometimes without any arbuscules or vesicles.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Weiss <xref rid="bib87" ref-type="bibr">[87]</xref>, observing the remains of plants in coal-balls and starting from the existence of Phycomycetous fungi in Permo-Carboniferous times, considered that the modes of life of the fungi in the Palaeozoic differed very little from those of living fungi. He concluded: “the highly specialized mutual adaptation of fungus and cormophyte did actually exist in the Palaeozoic age”; because of the peculiar character of the fossil he described, he suggested to call it <italic>Mycorhizonium</italic>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>The name used to define the mycorrhizal symbiosis has changed through the years. Wilde and Lafond <xref rid="bib88" ref-type="bibr">[88]</xref> replaced the adjectives ‘ectotrophic’ and ‘endotrophic’ with ‘ectocellular’ and ‘endocellular’, and Peyronel et al. <xref rid="bib57" ref-type="bibr">[57]</xref> suggested the terms ‘ectomycorrhizas’ and ‘endomycorrhizas’. The endomycorrhizal association has been frequently called ‘phycomycetous mycorrhiza’; because of the absence of systematic significance, ‘phycomycetous mycorrhiza’ have been replaced with ‘vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza’ and with ‘arbuscular mycorrhiza’ after the recognition that not all fungi formed vesicles.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>The naming of the fungus has also been of great discussion. Before Peyronel's works <xref rid="bib56" ref-type="bibr">[56]</xref>, fungi involved in arbuscular mycorrhiza were considered to belong to the genus <italic>Pythium</italic>. Peyronel suggested placing them in the genus <italic>Endogone</italic> Then Nicolson and Gerdemann <xref rid="bib52" ref-type="bibr">[52]</xref> and Mosse and Bowen <xref rid="bib48" ref-type="bibr">[48]</xref> added new species to this list and each of them divided the fungi into two groups of <italic>Endogone</italic>. Later Gerdemann and Trappe <xref rid="bib28" ref-type="bibr">[28]</xref> split the genus <italic>Endogone</italic> into seven genera and retained four mycorrhizal genera including <italic>Glomus</italic>, <italic>Sclerocystis</italic>, <italic>Gigaspora</italic>, and <italic>Acaulospora</italic> that were placed in the Endogonaceae, Zygomycetes. Several arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal genera were then added, the order of the Glomales was suggested by Morton and Benny <xref rid="bib47" ref-type="bibr">[47]</xref>, and a new phylum the Glomeromycota was established by Schüßler et al. <xref rid="bib71" ref-type="bibr">[71]</xref> using molecular data.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>In the earliest land plants such as in extant bryophytes and pteridophytes, structures analogous to mycorrhizae of spermatophytes are observed. As it has been clarified by several authors, the underground axes of these plants are not roots and the infested organs may be rhizomes or thalli. The associations are called mycorhizomes and mycothalli <xref rid="bib6" ref-type="bibr">[6]</xref>, endomycothalli <xref rid="bib79" ref-type="bibr">[79]</xref>, or mycorrhiza-like associations <xref rid="bib9" ref-type="bibr">[9]</xref>, <xref rid="bib38" ref-type="bibr">[38]</xref> and <xref rid="bib66" ref-type="bibr">[66]</xref>. Considering this, a new nomenclature is suggested in this paper to define two types of mycorrhizae (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>):<list>
                  <list-item>
                     <label>•</label>
                     <p>paramycorrhizae for the colonization of the thallus and shoot system. This case is represented in the gametophyte or/and the sporophyte. The fungal associations are mycothalli or mycorhizomes;</p>
                  </list-item>
                  <list-item>
                     <label>•</label>
                     <p>eumycorrhizae for the colonization of the root system. In this case, only the sporophyte is concerned.</p>
                  </list-item>
               </list>
            </p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>The term ‘mycorrhiza’ embraces three basic types of dual organs involving plants of most clades of embryophytes and the three fungal phyla : Glomeromycota, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota types (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). Arbuscular mycorrhiza and ectomycorrhiza are the most widely distributed and one other form exists, concerning two groups of plants: the orchid/ericoid type restricted respectively to the Orchidaceae and to the order Ericales <xref rid="bib78" ref-type="bibr">[78]</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>In arbuscular mycorrhizae, fungal hyphae penetrate inside the cortical tissues of roots or shoot systems or also inside thallus cells; they display intracellular coils, vesicles and arbuscules as well as lysis of the fungus in the host cells. Fungi of the glomyceromycetous type form endomycorrhizal associations with a wide range of clades among the embryophytes <xref rid="bib74" ref-type="bibr">[74]</xref> and <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Ectomycorrhizae develop a fungal network closed to the roots; they show a mantle that surrounds bifurcate or monopodial short roots and a Hartig net that penetrate between the cortical cells. Ascomycetous and basidiomycetous fungi form ectomycorrhizae with Gymnosperms [<italic>Pinaceae</italic> (all genus), <italic>Cupressaceae</italic>, <italic>Gnetaceae</italic>] and a few family of Angiosperms (<italic>Fagaceae</italic>, <italic>Betulaceae</italic>, <italic>Salicaceae</italic>, <italic>Juglandaceae</italic>, <italic>Ulmaceae</italic>, <italic>Dipterocarpaceae</italic>, <italic>Sarcolaenaceae</italic>, <italic>Rosaceae</italic>, <italic>Caesalpininioidea</italic>, <italic>Tiliaceae</italic>, and <italic>Myrtaceae</italic>).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Ericoid and orchid mycorrhizae also show intracellular colonization. Fungal hyphae penetrate inside the tissues of the host; intracellular coils and vesicles are present. Ascomycetous fungi are associated with members of the order Ericales and a few liverworts, while Basidiomycetous associations are found in Orchidaceae and also a few liverworts <xref rid="bib61" ref-type="bibr">[61]</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <label>3</label>
         <title>The embryophytes</title>
         <sec>
            <p>The origin and early evolution of embryophytes occurred in the mid-Palaeozoic era (480–360 Myr). Land plants evolved from simple structures consisting of only a few cells to complex organisms with specialized organs and tissue systems. Land plants are recognized in the fossil records in the mid-Silurian, 50 Myr after land plant spores, which appeared as spore tetrads (mid-Ordovician).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Phylogenetic studies favour a single origin of land plants from charophycean green algae: either Coleochaetales, or Charales, or a group containing both is sister group to land plants. However, the exact relationships between bryophytes (i.e. liverworts, hornworts, and mosses) and tracheophytes remain controversial. Among vascular plants, lycophytes are the sister group to euphyllophytes that contains all other living vascular plants. The split between lycophytes and euphyllophytes occurred in the Silurian. Most extant lycophytes are relatively small plants that possess microcophylls; they comprise three main clades: Lycopodiales (clubmosses), Isoetales (quillworths) and Selaginellales (spikemosses). However, in the Carboniferous period, many lycophytes, as <italic>Lepidodendron</italic>, were large arborescent forms.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Living euphyllophytes belong to two major clades: monilophytes and spermatophytes (seed plants). Euphyllophytes exhibit a great diversity; they possess megaphylls, pseudomonopodial or monopodial branching, a basically helical arrangement of branches, sporangia in pairs grouped into terminal trusses and a lobed primary xylem strand <xref rid="bib35" ref-type="bibr">[35]</xref>. The monilophytes (= Moniliformopses, sensu Kenrick &amp; Crane <xref rid="bib35" ref-type="bibr">[35]</xref>) have protoxylem confined to lobes of the xylem strand. Extant members belong to two clades: Equisetopsids (horsetails), and Filicopsids (ferns). The fossil cladoxylopsids belong almost certainly to the monilophytes. Like lycophytes, monilophytes are plants that produced spores and not seeds; these clades were traditionally called ‘pteridophytes’ <xref rid="bib60" ref-type="bibr">[60]</xref>. Spermatophytes are characterized by the presence of seeds, secondary xylem, and phloem produced by a bifacial cambium and axillary branching. Cycads, Ginkgo, conifers, gnetophytes, and angiosperms are the five major clades of extant seed plants. Several extinct fossil clades or grades of pteridosperms also belong to this group <xref rid="bib33" ref-type="bibr">[33]</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <label>4</label>
         <title>Origin and evolution of mycorrhizal symbiosis</title>
         <sec>
            <p>It is likely that the colonization of land by terrestrial eukaryotes has been possible only through associations between a photosynthetic organism and a fungus. The two organisms formed a mutualistic symbiosis that allowed them both to exploit the new environments. Today these symbioses are mainly represented by lichens and mycorrhizae. By reporting that glomeromycotan symbioses show a broad spectrum of phototrophs, Schüßler and Wolf <xref rid="bib70" ref-type="bibr">[70]</xref> expand Pirozynsky and Malloch's hypothesis <xref rid="bib59" ref-type="bibr">[59]</xref> about the relationship between an aquatic alga and a ‘phycomycetous’ fungus suggested as the initial step in land plant colonization.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>The AM fungi, which are now the most widely distributed mycorrhizal symbiosis, represent one of the few plant-fungus relationships that have a fossil record. Glomeromycota has a record beginning with Ordovician spores (460 Myr) <xref rid="bib62" ref-type="bibr">[62]</xref> and evidence for the occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizae dated from 400 Myr ago <xref rid="bib63" ref-type="bibr">[63]</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Taking account both the basal designation of liveworts in land plant evolution and the basal position assigned to the genus <italic>Haplomitrium</italic> and <italic>Treubia</italic> in phylogenetic reconstructions, Duckett et al. <xref rid="bib20" ref-type="bibr">[20]</xref> suggest that the glomeromycotean associations in these plants could be even more ancient than those in rootless vascular plants and even could be establish before the evolution of rhizoids. Otherwise, Schüßler and Wolf <xref rid="bib70" ref-type="bibr">[70]</xref> consider the <italic>Geosiphon</italic> symbiosis as the only known fungal endosymbiosis between cyanobacteria and glomeromycotan fungus. For these authors, the <italic>Geosiphon</italic> symbiosis appears to mirror a possible ancestor to arbuscular mycorrhiza that could have occurred in terrestrial ecosystems before land plants evolved.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Other mycorrhizal forms evolved later. The evolution of ectomycorrhizae is relatively recent; the first fossil ectomycorrhizae described by LePage et al. <xref rid="bib41" ref-type="bibr">[41]</xref> are dated from 50 Myr ago, and more recently Fairon Demaret et al. <xref rid="bib21" ref-type="bibr">[21]</xref> observed this type of association also .3from the Eocene (55 Myr). Ectomycorrhizae are the most frequent type in the forests and woodlands of cool–temperate and boreal latitudes and they also occur in tropical forests. Alexander <xref rid="bib1" ref-type="bibr">[1]</xref> reported that the ECM habit has arisen independently of the course of evolution in Pinaceae; he also reported several disparate lineages of angiosperms. It has been suggested that the evolution of ectomycorrhizae can be pushed to before 135 Myr <xref rid="bib49" ref-type="bibr">[49]</xref>. Orchid and ericoid mycorrhizae are more difficult to date; the only information is given by the evolution of their host taxon. Fossil records of the Ericacea date back only to the Early Tertiary <xref rid="bib42" ref-type="bibr">[42]</xref>, and several putative proto-orchids have been identified from the Eocene <xref rid="bib69" ref-type="bibr">[69]</xref>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>Except the earliest arbuscular mycorrhizae, which are quite different from the other forms, and according to Marks <xref rid="bib46" ref-type="bibr">[46]</xref>, ectomycorrhizae seem to be of the earliest type from which ericoid and orchid types developed. However, Brundrett <xref rid="bib9" ref-type="bibr">[9]</xref> suggested that all types of mycorrhizae are derived from arbuscular mycorrhizae, with possible intermediate stages.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <label>5</label>
         <title>Mycorrhizal status related to the different clades of Embryophytes</title>
         <sec>
            <p>Mycorrhization that occurs in most embryophytes is shown following the various clades presented in <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>. For each clade, fossil occurences are reported and then mycorrhizal status in living plants is developed.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.1</label>
            <title>Marchantiophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Although fossil liverworts have been described from the Aptian of Spain and that of Antarctica, no fossil record exists for mycorrhizae. Marchantiophytes (liverworts) belong to the paraphyletic Bryophyta. They are divided into Marchantiopsida and Jungermanniopsida <xref rid="bib72" ref-type="bibr">[72]</xref>. In the living clade, the colonization by the mycorrhizal fungus is restricted to the gametophyte. The occurrence of symbiosis between hepathics and fungi has been known for over a century; these early works have been reviewed by Boullard <xref rid="bib7" ref-type="bibr">[7]</xref> and have been confirmed for the last 30 years <xref rid="bib61" ref-type="bibr">[61]</xref>. Two types of associations are recognized according to whether the fungus possesses septate or no septate hyphae:<list>
                     <list-item>
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p>glomeromycetous infections of the arbuscular mycorrhizal type occur in many liveworts: this is reported for thalloid <xref rid="bib20" ref-type="bibr">[20]</xref>, <xref rid="bib65" ref-type="bibr">[65]</xref> and <xref rid="bib79" ref-type="bibr">[79]</xref> as well as leafy species <xref rid="bib12" ref-type="bibr">[12]</xref>;</p>
                     </list-item>
                     <list-item>
                        <label>•</label>
                        <p>ascomycetous/basidiomycetous infections occur in Jungermanniopsida: the rhizoid infections observed in some leafy Jungermanniopsida are caused by ascomycetous fungi <xref rid="bib19" ref-type="bibr">[19]</xref>, the intercellular growth resembling pelotons developed in ericoid mycorrhizae. In leafy and thalloid Jungermanniopsida, basidiomycetes form intracellular hyphal pelotons with lysis in the host cells similar to the infection in orchid mycorrhizae <xref rid="bib45" ref-type="bibr">[45]</xref> and <xref rid="bib61" ref-type="bibr">[61]</xref>
                        </p>
                     </list-item>
                  </list>
               </p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.2</label>
            <title>Anthocerotophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Frahm <xref rid="bib24" ref-type="bibr">[24]</xref> reported the first record of a fossil hornwort from Dominican amber, but to date no fossil record is available for mycorrhizae. The mycotrophic status of living anthocerotophytes is also uncertain. Inter- and intracellular fungal endophytes were found in several anthocerotophytes species <xref rid="bib64" ref-type="bibr">[64]</xref>, but this clade has been considered as devoid of fungal infection until the observation of fungal infection in <italic>Phaeoceros laevis</italic> (L.) Prosk. <xref rid="bib44" ref-type="bibr">[44]</xref>. The gametophyte of <italic>P. laevis</italic> is associated with an aseptate fungus that forms extracellular thick-walled hyphae, intercellular thin-walled hyphae and intracellular arbuscules; vesicles are also present.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.3</label>
            <title>Bryophytes s.s.</title>
            <sec>
               <p>There are very few descriptions of fossil bryophytes and no data concerning mycorrhization. For extant mosses, the largest group of bryophytes are considered as being non mycorrhizal, but often contain endophytic hyphae. Read et al. <xref rid="bib61" ref-type="bibr">[61]</xref> stated that it is certainly of physiological interest that the mosses resist colonization by mycorrhizal fungi.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.4</label>
            <title>Aglaophyton/Lyonophyton</title>
            <sec>
               <p>The fossil relationships between fungi and plants suggested by Kidston and Lang <xref rid="bib36" ref-type="bibr">[36]</xref> in the Rhynie chert have now been documented <xref rid="bib8" ref-type="bibr">[8]</xref>, <xref rid="bib63" ref-type="bibr">[63]</xref> and <xref rid="bib85" ref-type="bibr">[85]</xref>. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses may be deduced based on the presence of hyphae, vesicles, intracellular arbuscules and spores. The fungus <italic>Glomites rhyniensis</italic> is known from A<italic>glaophyton</italic> sporophyte, and from the young gametophyte <italic>Lyonophyton rhyniensis.</italic> A continuous dark band in the cortex of <italic>Aglaophyton</italic> contains the arbuscules; the first recognisable arbuscules occur in young aerial axes in the gametophyte.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.5</label>
            <title>Paratracheophytes: Rhynia</title>
            <sec>
               <p>As for <italic>Aglaophyton</italic>, Boullard and Lemoigne <xref rid="bib8" ref-type="bibr">[8]</xref> reconsidered the possible fossil relationship suggested by Kindston and Lang <xref rid="bib36" ref-type="bibr">[36]</xref> about <italic>Rhynia</italic>. They proved that <italic>Rhynia</italic> elaborated mycothallus by pointing typical arbuscular mycorrhizal structures.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.6</label>
            <title>Lycophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>The presence of endomycorrhizal fungi has been reported from fossil lycophytes. Krings et al. <xref rid="bib39" ref-type="bibr">[39]</xref> and <xref rid="bib40" ref-type="bibr">[40]</xref> describe rhizomatous axes of <italic>Nothia aphylla</italic>, an early plant from the Rhynie chert with possible affinities in the zosterophyllophytes (the sister group to lycophytes), that host a fungus reminiscent of <italic>Glomites rhyniensis</italic> (Glomeromycota), the endomycorrhizal fungus of <italic>Aglaophyton major</italic>. The infection pathway in <italic>N. aphylla</italic> is distinctly different from that seen in <italic>A. major</italic>. The fungus enters the plant as an intracellular endophyte and then becomes intercellular in the cortex. The authors hypothesized that <italic>N. aphylla</italic> displays an alternative mode of colonisation by endomycorrhizal fungi, perhaps related to the peculiar anatomy of the lower portion of the rhizomatous axis (i.e. the rhizoidal ridge).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>
                  <italic>Palaeomyces asteroxylii</italic> has been observed in the inner cortex of rhizomes and basal parts of stems of <italic>Asteroxylon</italic>. It formed aseptate hyphae, which gave rise to fine branches and terminal vesicles. The similarity of this fungus and mycorrhizal fungi has been reported by several authors <xref rid="bib8" ref-type="bibr">[8]</xref>, <xref rid="bib30" ref-type="bibr">[30]</xref>, <xref rid="bib36" ref-type="bibr">[36]</xref>, <xref rid="bib51" ref-type="bibr">[51]</xref>, <xref rid="bib52" ref-type="bibr">[52]</xref> and <xref rid="bib59" ref-type="bibr">[59]</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>A few works on Carboniferous floras described endomycorrhizae in rhizomes or roots of different plants. Weiss <xref rid="bib87" ref-type="bibr">[87]</xref> observed this type of association showing digestion phases on root or rhizome of a plant having affinity to the Lycopodiales, and several authors noted the occurrence of mycorrhizal fungi (Endogonaceae) in Carboniferous coal balls from Europe and America (see <xref rid="bib86" ref-type="bibr">[86]</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Lycophytes were the first plants with roots <xref rid="bib36" ref-type="bibr">[36]</xref>. They have a separate gametophyte phase without roots and a sporophyte with roots and microphylls. The living llycophytes comprise Lycopodiales, Selaginellales, and Isoetales. The gametophytes of <italic>Lycopodium</italic> can be either subterranean and achlorophyllous, or surface living and chlorophyllous, depending on the species, and both are invaded by fungi. Boullard <xref rid="bib6" ref-type="bibr">[6]</xref> considered that these gametophytes generally formed mycothalli. An association showing some characteristics of AM without arbuscules and with very fine coiled hyphae has been observed in the subterraneum gametophyte of <italic>Lycopodium clavatum</italic>
                  <xref rid="bib66" ref-type="bibr">[66]</xref>. Arbuscule-like structures have also been described in chlorophyllous gametophytes of <italic>Lycopodium cernuum</italic>
                  <xref rid="bib17" ref-type="bibr">[17]</xref>. <italic>Lycopodium</italic> and <italic>Selaginella</italic> sporophytes develop AM associations, whereas <italic>Isoetes</italic> until now appear to lack this type of association.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.7</label>
            <title>Psilophyton</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Fungal reproductive structures have been found within aerial axes of <italic>Psilophyton dawsonii</italic> restricted to the inner cortical regions <xref rid="bib82" ref-type="bibr">[82]</xref>. These fungal structures are compared to other fossil and extant spores and a possible mycorrhizal status is discussed.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.8</label>
            <title>Cladoxylales</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Several occurrences of mycorrhizal associations have been reported from the axis of a putatively primitive member of the Cladoxylales (W. Stein, pers. commun.). Fungal hyphae and vesicles occur in the cortex, and extraradical spores arise from intraradical hyphae, or are disarticulated in the matrix.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.9</label>
            <title>Sphenophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>
                  <italic>Equisetum</italic> is the surviving genus of the well-represented arborescent sphenophytes from Carboniferous period. Fossil mycorrhizae have not yet been discovered in this clade. Mycorrhizae are unknown in the photosynthetic gametophytes of <italic>Equisetum</italic> and the mycorrhizal status of the sporophyte is still controversial. First, the genus was classified as non-mycotrophic, but Koske et al. <xref rid="bib37" ref-type="bibr">[37]</xref> showed that the infection depends upon associated plants and/or soil moisture conditions. However, their conclusions are based on a small sample. According to Dhillion <xref rid="bib16" ref-type="bibr">[16]</xref>, typical vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal structures occurred in the roots of the sporophytes of <italic>Equisetum</italic> and it is reported that plants growing in wet (hydric) habitats had lower levels of colonization by AM mycorrhizal fungi than plants growing in mesic/dry-mesic habitats. The habitat is considered to play putatively an important role in determining the degree of mycotrophy in these plants.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.10</label>
            <title>Filicophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Andrews and Lenz <xref rid="bib2" ref-type="bibr">[2]</xref> observed symbiotic fungus in the cortical cells of a fern stem, possibly a rhizome of <italic>Scleropteris illinoiensis</italic> from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Illinois. They called this association mycorrhizome, based on the comparison between dense tangles of mycelium or ovoid bodies and living mycorrhizae. Colonization by fungal hyphae have been observed in the inner cortex of <italic>Botryopteris antiqua</italic> (Strullu-Derrien, personal observation); the occurrence of coils and vesicles is consistent with the notion of ‘Paris’-type mycorrhiza.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Mycorrhizal symbiosis is of general occurrence in living filicophytes, except Marsilaceae and Salviniaceae <xref rid="bib6" ref-type="bibr">[6]</xref> and <xref rid="bib30" ref-type="bibr">[30]</xref>. By studying the arbuscular mycorrhizae of pteridophytes in New Zealand, Cooper <xref rid="bib14" ref-type="bibr">[14]</xref> reached practically the same conclusion. Berch and Kendrick <xref rid="bib4" ref-type="bibr">[4]</xref> in southern Ontario and Zhao <xref rid="bib89" ref-type="bibr">[89]</xref> in Yunnan (southwestern China) observed that the arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization was low in sporophytes of leptosporangiates ferns, whereas it was relatively high in the eurosporangiates. According to Brundrett <xref rid="bib9" ref-type="bibr">[9]</xref>, ferns like <italic>Ophioglossum</italic> and <italic>Botrychium</italic> have sporophytes with relatively thick roots, which are consistently mycorrhizal, while Filicales that have more fine roots with long roots hairs, show limited or inconsistent mycorrhization. On the other hand, Gemma et al. <xref rid="bib27" ref-type="bibr">[27]</xref> observed that the highest proportion of arbuscular mycorrhizae among the 89 species studied in Hawaï concerned Dicksoniaceae, Dryopteridaceae, and Lindsaeaceae. The occurrence in the eurosporangiates was low.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Two different growth forms exist among gametophytes of ferns: green epiterrestrial forms and achlorophyllous subterranean forms <xref rid="bib61" ref-type="bibr">[61]</xref> and <xref rid="bib67" ref-type="bibr">[67]</xref>. Boullard <xref rid="bib6" ref-type="bibr">[6]</xref> suggested that the dependence of fern gametophytes on mycotrophism decreased with increasing the photosynthetic ability.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations have been reported for the gametophytes of <italic>Psilotum</italic> and <italic>Tmesipteris</italic>
                  <xref rid="bib6" ref-type="bibr">[6]</xref> and <xref rid="bib55" ref-type="bibr">[55]</xref>; cortical cells are occupied by dense coils of aseptate hyphae with some of which bearing terminal vesicles. Rhizomes and roots of the sporophytes are generally colonized. More recently, Duckett and Ligrone <xref rid="bib18" ref-type="bibr">[18]</xref> observed glomeromycotean fungi in sporophytes and gametophytes of <italic>Psilotum</italic> and <italic>Tmesipteris</italic> that are entirely intracellular, and colonization closely resembles the ‘Paris’-type mycorrhiza; large-trunk hyphae, arbuscules and degeneration in the host cells are described.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Other patterns have been presented for mycorrhization in ferns. Schmid and Oberwinkler <xref rid="bib68" ref-type="bibr">[68]</xref> observed associations with coils in the roots of <italic>Gleichneniaceae</italic>, which are formed by an unidentified ascomycete. Cooper <xref rid="bib14" ref-type="bibr">[14]</xref> reported the occurrence of ectomycorrhizae in a fern, but as it is shown by the illustrated root, it is probably the root of a <italic>Nothofagus</italic> that is concerned <xref rid="bib9" ref-type="bibr">[9]</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.11</label>
            <title>Progymnosperms and Pteridosperms</title>
            <sec>
               <p>To date no data are available for mycorrhization of Progymnosperms and Pteridosperms.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.12</label>
            <title>Cycadophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Fossil arbuscular mycorrhizae occurred in silicified roots from the Triassic of Antarctica; Stubblefield et al. <xref rid="bib83" ref-type="bibr">[83]</xref> and <xref rid="bib84" ref-type="bibr">[84]</xref> observed nonseptate fungal hyphae within and between cells of the central cortex and swellings comparable to chlamydospores and vesicles. Arbuscules are also present nearly filling the host cell. Example of a mixed colony comprised of fungi with affinities to the <italic>Glomineae</italic> and the <italic>Gigasporineae</italic> are given by Phipps and Taylor <xref rid="bib58" ref-type="bibr">[58]</xref> also from the Triassic of Antarctica. The fossil gigasporinean mycorrhiza shows irregular intercellular and intracellular hyphae coiled within the cells and arbuscules with thick trunks and narrow branches. In the glominean form, hyphal diameter is more uniform, with coiling rarely present and arbuscules showing thin trunks. Vesicles may be lateral or terminal and spores are not found.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Like fossil members, living cycads show arbuscular mycorrhizae in their roots. Muthukumar and Udaiyan <xref rid="bib50" ref-type="bibr">[50]</xref> reported that root colonization is a typical ‘Arum’ mycorrhizal type; however various levels of colonization exist among the species. It has been suggested that the endomycorrhizal fungi in cycads have a special function, i.e. to promote the fixing of nitrogen by the endosymbiotic cyanobacteria <xref rid="bib23" ref-type="bibr">[23]</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.13</label>
            <title>Ginkgophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Fossil mutualistic associations have not yet been shown in Ginkgophytes. In living <italic>Ginkgo biloba</italic> Bonfante-Fasolo and Fontana <xref rid="bib5" ref-type="bibr">[5]</xref> described arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses; intercellular hyphae and vesicles are rare while intracellular coils and intercalary arbuscules are abundant in the inner cortex. According to Smith and Smith, Gingko should be included in a ‘near-Paris’ or ‘intermediate’ type.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.14</label>
            <title>Coniferophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>Fossil mycorrhizae have been reported in cordaitean rootlets by several authors <xref rid="bib29" ref-type="bibr">[29]</xref>, <xref rid="bib43" ref-type="bibr">[43]</xref>, <xref rid="bib54" ref-type="bibr">[54]</xref> and <xref rid="bib90" ref-type="bibr">[90]</xref>. In <italic>Amyelon radicans</italic>, Osborn observed aseptate hyphae that have given rise to clumps in the inner cortical region; vesicles were also found. Halket confirmed these observations, but found more frequent septa in the hyphae. Later Harley <xref rid="bib30" ref-type="bibr">[30]</xref> and Boullard and Lemoigne <xref rid="bib8" ref-type="bibr">[8]</xref> corroborated Osborn's observations. Cridland <xref rid="bib15" ref-type="bibr">[15]</xref> re-examined most specimens of cordaitean rootlets supposed to contain mycorrhizae and found that fungi are sometimes present, but not constant in occurrence, and seem to be parasites or saprophytes and not symbionts. Baxter <xref rid="bib3" ref-type="bibr">[3]</xref> considered that the mycorrhizal nature of the fungi is open to question, because he never found any hyphae in the tissues of well-preserved specimens.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Cordaites are the sister group to Coniferophytes. Fossil mycorrhizae have been observed in a few members of the latter clade. Stockey et al. <xref rid="bib76" ref-type="bibr">[76]</xref> described arbuscular mycorhizae from anatomically preserved roots of the Middle Eocene taxodiaceous conifer <italic>Metasequoia milleri</italic>. Mycorrhizal structures occur in the root cortex. Coiled hyphae are most common within cells of the inner cortical region, and these produce numerous, highly branched arbuscules. Another example of mycorrhizal association has been given by Cantrill and Douglas <xref rid="bib10" ref-type="bibr">[10]</xref> on fossil roots with nodular and abbreviated lateral roots from the Lower Cretaceous of the Otway Basin, Victoria (Australia). Roots are placed together with foliage of <italic>Geinitzia tetragona sp. nov.</italic>, which is possibly taxodiaceous.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>The occurrence of fossil ectomycorrhizae in Coniferophytes has been first demonstrated by LePage et al. <xref rid="bib41" ref-type="bibr">[41]</xref>. Ectomycorrhizae have been found among permineralized plant remains in the Middle Eocene Princeton chert of British Columbia. They are associated with roots of <italic>Pinus</italic> and show a Hartig net that extends into the endodermis, a pseudoparenchymatous mantle, and contiguous extramatrical hyphae. The mycorrhizal rootlets lack root hairs and dichotomize repeatedly to form large, coralloid clusters. Reproductive structures are absent. For the fungus, the authors suggested the comparison with the extant basidiomycete genera <italic>Rhizopogon</italic> and <italic>Suillus</italic>. Ectomycorrhizal associations have also been described by Fairon-Demaret et al. <xref rid="bib21" ref-type="bibr">[21]</xref> on small roots that may belong to the taxodiaceous <italic>Glyptostroboxylon</italic> from the Eocene of Belgium (55 Myr). A mantle of hyphae surrounds each root frequently branched and a tiny Hartig net has been observed.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Except for all the Pinaceae and some genus in the Cupressaceae that form ectomycorrhizae, all living Coniferophytes in the northern hemisphere as well as in the southern hemisphere show arbuscular mycorrhizal associations <xref rid="bib74" ref-type="bibr">[74]</xref> and <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.15</label>
            <title>Gnetophytes</title>
            <sec>
               <p>No fossil mycorrhizae are known in Gnetophytes. Living Gnetophytes comprise the three genus <italic>Gnetum</italic>, <italic>Ephedra</italic>, and <italic>Welwitschia</italic>. Ectomycorrhizae have been observed in <italic>Gnetum</italic> by several authors <xref rid="bib22" ref-type="bibr">[22]</xref>, <xref rid="bib53" ref-type="bibr">[53]</xref> and <xref rid="bib75" ref-type="bibr">[75]</xref>. Collier et al. <xref rid="bib13" ref-type="bibr">[13]</xref> described the tendency to be mycorrhizal for desert annual and perennial plants, and reported the occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizae in <italic>Ephedra trifurca</italic>. <italic>Welwitschia mirabilis</italic> is also associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, but Jacobson et al. <xref rid="bib31" ref-type="bibr">[31]</xref> noted that <italic>W. mirabilis</italic> is not mycorrhizal at sites of the Namib Desert where grasses are absent.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <label>5.16</label>
            <title>Angiosperms</title>
            <sec>
               <p>To date no fossil mycorrhizal record is available for angiosperms. However, the three basic types of mycorrhizae occur in extant angiosperms. Only a few orders (Ceratophyllales, Caryophyllales, Brassicales) are usually considered as non-mycorrhizal <xref rid="bib74" ref-type="bibr">[74]</xref> and <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>. A review of mycorrhizae in living angiosperms with information on the mycorrhizal status of the various families is given by Brundrett <xref rid="bib9" ref-type="bibr">[9]</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>The above analyses of the mycorrhizal status of embryophytes are summarized in <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>. The mycorrhizal status is presented in relation with the different clades of embryophytes, including fossil and living plants, and it shows the distinction between paramycorrhizae and eumycorrhizae. While mycorrhization is documented very well for living plants, there are only a few studies for fossil plants and the examples reported are often controversial. Some examples awaiting further analyses are shown in <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref> and some others are being studied (<italic>Nothia, Botryopteris, Amyelon, Glyptostroboxylon…</italic>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>Plants belonging to the lycophytes and monilophytes clades represent the group in which fossil and living members develop both paramycorrhizae and eumycorrhizae. It seems very important to study the fungal symbiosis on this turning point group. This may contribute to understand why lycophytes and monilophytes have now so few surviving arborescent genus and why the angiosperms are dominant in modern environments.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p>An important point to be taken into consideration is the wet habitats of the earliest plants and of plants growing in cold environments <xref rid="bib81" ref-type="bibr">[81]</xref>. It has been generally accepted that AM associations exist in living plants growing in wet habitats. Additionally, dark pigmented septate endophytes are frequent colonisers of plant roots under these extreme environmental conditions, capable of forming mutualistic associations functionally similar to mycorrhiza <xref rid="bib34" ref-type="bibr">[34]</xref>, together with an important role of melanin synthesis for protection. AM associations in wet habitats as well as dark pigmented septate endophytes reported by only a few authors have to be taken into account for an overall study of the mycorrhization.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <label>6</label>
         <title>Conclusion</title>
         <sec>
            <p>Once on land, early plants had to build most of their organs and tissue systems. To do this, they had two alternatives: obtaining their own means of taking nutrients and water from the environment or developing associations with fungi that could provide these nutritional elements. The key role of the fungal symbiosis in the colonization of land has been recognized. The existence of mycorrhizae in fossil groups indicates that compatibility and ability to bypass the host defences were already developed in paramycorrhizae before the acquisition of root system and the evolution of eumycorrhizae. Further molecular studies are needed to detail this idea.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p>In both paramycorrhizae and eumycorrhizae types, plant cells are invaded by the fungus; the fungus is surrounded by the host plasmalemma and a dual apoplast; in living plants, the reduction of amyloplasts is visible. Paramycorrhizae and eumycorrhizae are distinguished by many characteristics. Paramycorrhizae colonize thalli and shoot systems, show presence of chloroplasts in infected cells and limited photosynthetate transport. Thalli and shoot systems grow above ground and are highly dominant compared to underground structures. They display functions such as photosynthesis, transpiration, reproduction, transport and hormone production; they are also storage organs. These associations represent a primitive photosynthesis-powered plant–fungi–soil system; they are a key element of plant colonization, and they can be spread by vegetative reproduction. Eumycorrhizae, on the other hand, colonize root systems. Chloroplasts are absent in infected cells and a significant photosynthetate transport can be noted. Roots develop various functions such as carbon pumps, hydraulic conduits, or chemical factories; they represent storage organs, mechanical structures and develop an important absorptive network. In the course of plant evolution, roots have become more and more sophisticated. In spermatophytes, the root system is of equal importance to that of the shoot system, and eumycorrhizae occur as a highly evolved photosynthesis-powered plant–fungi–soil system. They are a key element of soil functioning and plant production. Associated with structures such as seeds and flowers, the existence of eumycorrhizae could explain the success of angiosperms in aerial environments.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
   </body>
   <back>
      <ack>
         <title>Acknowledgements</title>
         <p>The authors thank M. Krings (Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany), P. Gerrienne (University of Liège, Belgium), I. van Aarle (University of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium), and J. Galtier (Cirad, Montpellier, France) for their helpful comments. They acknowledge D. de Franceschi and J. Dejax (‘Muséum national d’histoire naturelle’, Paris) for faciliting the examination of Renault and Roche's slides and F. Poncet (Angers, France) for technical assistance.</p>
      </ack>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="bib1">
            <label>[1]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Alexander</surname>
                  <given-names>I.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Ectomycorrhizas-out Africa ?</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>172</volume>
               <year>2006</year>
               <page-range>589–591</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib2">
            <label>[2]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Andrews</surname>
                  <given-names>H.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lenz</surname>
                  <given-names>L.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A mycorrhizome from the Carboniferous of Illinois</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Torrey Bot. Club</source>
               <volume>70</volume>
               <issue>2</issue>
               <year>1943</year>
               <page-range>120–125</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib3">
            <label>[3]</label>
            <mixed-citation>R.W. Baxter, Fossil fungi from american Pennsylvanian coal balls, Paleontological contributions, University of Kansas, Laurence, Kansas, USA, 77, 1975.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib4">
            <label>[4]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Berch</surname>
                  <given-names>S.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kendrick</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae of southern Ontario ferns and fern-allies</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia</source>
               <volume>74</volume>
               <issue>5</issue>
               <year>1982</year>
               <page-range>769–776</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib5">
            <label>[5]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Bonfante-Fasolo</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fontana</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>VAM fungi in <italic>Ginkgo biloba</italic> roots: their interactions at cellular level</article-title>
               <source>Symbiosis</source>
               <volume>1</volume>
               <year>1985</year>
               <page-range>53–67</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib6">
            <label>[6]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Boullard S B.</surname>
               </name>
               <article-title>Considérations sur la symbiose fongique chez les Ptéridophytes</article-title>
               <source>Syllogeus</source>
               <volume>19</volume>
               <year>1979</year>
               <page-range>1–58</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib7">
            <label>[7]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Boullard</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Observations on the coevolution of fungi with hepatics</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pirozynski</surname>
                  <given-names>K.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hawksworth</surname>
                  <given-names>D.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Coevolution of fungi with plants and animals</article-title>
               <year>1988</year>
               <publisher-name>London</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Academic Press</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>107–124</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib8">
            <label>[8]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Boullard</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lemoigne</surname>
                  <given-names>Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Les champignons endophytes du <italic>Rhynia gwynne-vaughanii</italic> K. &amp; L. Étude morphologique et déductions sur leur biologie</article-title>
               <source>Botaniste</source>
               <volume>54</volume>
               <year>1971</year>
               <page-range>49–89</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib9">
            <label>[9]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Brundrett</surname>
                  <given-names>M.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plant</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>154</volume>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>275–304</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib10">
            <label>[10]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cantrill</surname>
                  <given-names>D.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Douglas</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizal conifer roots from the Lower Cretaceous of the Otway Basin, Victoria</article-title>
               <source>Austr. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>36</volume>
               <year>1988</year>
               <page-range>257–272</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib11">
            <label>[11]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Casana</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bonfante-Fasolo</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Ife intercellulari ed arbuscoli di ‘Glomus fasciculatum’ (Thaxter) Gerd. et Trappe isolato con digestione enzimatica</article-title>
               <source>Allionia</source>
               <volume>25</volume>
               <year>1982</year>
               <page-range>17–25</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib12">
            <label>[12]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Carafa</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Subterranean gametophytic axes in the primitive liverwort <italic>Haplomitrium</italic> harbour a unique type of endophytic association with aseptate fungi</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>160</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>185–197</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib13">
            <label>[13]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Collier</surname>
                  <given-names>S.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Yarnes</surname>
                  <given-names>C.T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Herman</surname>
                  <given-names>R.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizal dependency of Chihuahuan Desert plants is influenced by life history and root morphology</article-title>
               <source>J. Arid Environ.</source>
               <volume>55</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>223–229</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib14">
            <label>[14]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cooper</surname>
                  <given-names>K.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A field survey of mycorrhizas in New Zealand ferns</article-title>
               <source>New Zealand J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>14</volume>
               <year>1976</year>
               <page-range>169–181</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib15">
            <label>[15]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cridland</surname>
                  <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The fungi in cordaitean rootlets</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia</source>
               <volume>54</volume>
               <year>1962</year>
               <page-range>230–234</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib16">
            <label>[16]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Dhillion</surname>
                  <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas of <italic>Equisetum</italic> species in Norway and the USA: occurrence and mycotrophy</article-title>
               <source>Mycol. Res.</source>
               <volume>97</volume>
               <issue>6</issue>
               <year>1993</year>
               <page-range>656–660</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib17">
            <label>[17]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A light and electron microscope study of the fungal endophytes in the sporophyte and gametophyte of <italic>Lycopodium cernuum</italic> with observations of the gametophyte-sporophyte junction</article-title>
               <source>Can. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>70</volume>
               <year>1992</year>
               <page-range>58–72</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib18">
            <label>[18]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A comparative cytological analysis of fungal endophytes in the sporophyte rhizomes and vascularised gametophytes of <italic>Tmesipteris</italic> and <italic>Psilotum</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Can. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>83</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>1443–1456</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib19">
            <label>[19]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Read</surname>
                  <given-names>D.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Ericoid mycorrhizas and rhizoid-ascomycete associations in liverworts share the same mycobiont: isolation of the partners and resynthesis of the association in vitro</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>129</volume>
               <year>1995</year>
               <page-range>439–447</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib20">
            <label>[20]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Carafa</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A highly differentiated glomeromycotean association with the mucilage-secreting, primitive antipodean liverwort <italic>Treubia</italic> (Treubiaceae) : clues to the origins of mycorrhizas</article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>93</volume>
               <issue>6</issue>
               <year>2006</year>
               <page-range>797–813</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib21">
            <label>[21]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Fairon-Demaret</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Steurbaut</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Damblon</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dupuis</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gerrienne</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The in situ <italic>Glyptostroboxylon</italic> forest of Hoegaarden (Belgium) at the Initial Eocene Thermal Maximum (55 Ma)</article-title>
               <source>Rev. Paleontol. Palynol.</source>
               <volume>126</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>103–129</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib22">
            <label>[22]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Fassi</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Ectomycorrhizes chez le <italic>Gnetum africanum</italic> Welw. due à Scleroderma sp.</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr.</source>
               <volume>73</volume>
               <year>1957</year>
               <page-range>280–286</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib23">
            <label>[23]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Fischer</surname>
                  <given-names>J.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Vovides</surname>
                  <given-names>A.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizae are present in cycad roots</article-title>
               <source>Bot. Rev.</source>
               <volume>70</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>16–23</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib24">
            <label>[24]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Frahm</surname>
                  <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The first record of a fossil hornwort (Anthocerotophyta) from Dominican amber</article-title>
               <source>Bryologist</source>
               <volume>108</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>139–141</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib25">
            <label>[25]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Frank</surname>
                  <given-names>A.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Uber die auf Wurzelsymbiose beruhende Ernährung gewisser Baüme durch unterirdische Pilze</article-title>
               <source>Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.</source>
               <volume>3</volume>
               <year>1885</year>
               <page-range>128–145</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib26">
            <label>[26]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Gallaud</surname>
                  <given-names>I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Etudes sur les mycorrhizes endophytes</article-title>
               <source>Rev. Gen. Bot.</source>
               <volume>17</volume>
               <year>1905</year>
               <page-range>5–500</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib27">
            <label>[27]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Gemma</surname>
                  <given-names>J.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Koske</surname>
                  <given-names>R.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Flynn</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizae in Hawaiian Pteridophytes: occurrence and evolutionnary signifiance</article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>79</volume>
               <year>1992</year>
               <page-range>843–852</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib28">
            <label>[28]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Gerdemann</surname>
                  <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Trappe</surname>
                  <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Endogonaceae in the Pacific Northwest</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia Mem.</source>
               <volume>4</volume>
               <year>1974</year>
               <page-range>1–76</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib29">
            <label>[29]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Halket</surname>
                  <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The rootlets of <italic>Ameylon radicans</italic>, Will.; their anatomy, their apices and their endophytic fungus</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Bot.</source>
               <volume>44</volume>
               <year>1930</year>
               <page-range>865–905</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib30">
            <label>[30]</label>
            <mixed-citation>J.L. Harley, The biology of mycorrhiza, 2<sup>nd</sup> Edn, Leonard Hill, London,1969.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib31">
            <label>[31]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Jacobson</surname>
                  <given-names>K.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Jacobson</surname>
                  <given-names>P.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Miller</surname>
                  <given-names>O.K.</given-names>
                  <suffix>Jr.</suffix>
               </name>
               <article-title>The mycorrhizal status of Welwitschia mirabilis</article-title>
               <source>Mycorrhiza</source>
               <volume>3</volume>
               <issue>1</issue>
               <year>1993</year>
               <page-range>13–17</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib32">
            <label>[32]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Janse</surname>
                  <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Les endophytes radicaux de quelques plantes javanaises</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg</source>
               <volume>14</volume>
               <year>1897</year>
               <page-range>53–212</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib33">
            <label>[33]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Hilton</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bateman</surname>
                  <given-names>R.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Pteridosperms are the backbone of seed-plant phylogeny</article-title>
               <source>J. Torrey Bot. Soc.</source>
               <volume>133</volume>
               <issue>1</issue>
               <year>2006</year>
               <page-range>119–168</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib34">
            <label>[34]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Jumpponen</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Dark-septate endophytes-are they mycorrhizal?</article-title>
               <source>Mycorrhiza</source>
               <volume>11</volume>
               <year>2001</year>
               <page-range>207–211</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib35">
            <label>[35]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Kenrick</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Crane</surname>
                  <given-names>P.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The origin and early diversification of land plants. A cladistic study</source>
               <year>1997</year>
               <publisher-name>Smithsonian Institution Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Washington and London</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib36">
            <label>[36]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Kindston</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lang</surname>
                  <given-names>W.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>On old red sandstone plants showing structure, from the Rhynie chert bed, Aberdeenshire</article-title>
               <source>Trans. R. Soc. Edinb.</source>
               <volume>52</volume>
               <issue>part IV</issue>
               <year>1921</year>
               <page-range>855–901</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib37">
            <label>[37]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Koske</surname>
                  <given-names>R.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Friese</surname>
                  <given-names>C.F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Olexia</surname>
                  <given-names>P.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hauke</surname>
                  <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas in <italic>Equisetum</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.</source>
               <volume>85</volume>
               <issue>2</issue>
               <year>1985</year>
               <page-range>350–353</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib38">
            <label>[38]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Kottke</surname>
                  <given-names>R.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Nebel</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The evolution of mycorrhiza-like associations in liverworts: an update</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>167</volume>
               <issue>2</issue>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>330–334</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib39">
            <label>[39]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Krings</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hass</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kerp</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dotzler</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hermsen</surname>
                  <given-names>E.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: infection pathways, spatial distribution and host responses</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>174</volume>
               <issue>3</issue>
               <year>2007</year>
               <page-range>648–657</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib40">
            <label>[40]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Krings</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hass</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kerp</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dotzler</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hermsen</surname>
                  <given-names>E.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>An alternative mode of early land plant by putative endomycorrhizal fungi</article-title>
               <source>Plant Signal. Behav.</source>
               <volume>2</volume>
               <issue>2</issue>
               <year>2007</year>
               <page-range>125–126</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib41">
            <label>[41]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>LePage</surname>
                  <given-names>B.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Currah</surname>
                  <given-names>R.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Stockey</surname>
                  <given-names>R.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rothwell</surname>
                  <given-names>G.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Fossil ectomycorrhizas from the Middle Eocene</article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>84</volume>
               <year>1997</year>
               <page-range>410–412</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib42">
            <label>[42]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lewis</surname>
                  <given-names>D.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Evolutionary aspects of mutualistic associations between fungi and photosynthetic organisms</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rayner</surname>
                  <given-names>A.D.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Brasier</surname>
                  <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Moore</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Evolutionary biology of the fungi</article-title>
               <year>1987</year>
               <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>161–178</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib43">
            <label>[43]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lignier</surname>
                  <given-names>O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>
                  <italic>Radiculites reticulatus</italic> radicelle fossile de Sequoïnée</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr.</source>
               <volume>53</volume>
               <issue>4<sup>e</sup> Ser. VI</issue>
               <year>1906</year>
               <page-range>193–201</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib44">
            <label>[44]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Ultrastructure of a fungal endophyte in <italic>Phaeoceros laevis</italic> (L.) Prosk. (Anthocerotophyta)</article-title>
               <source>Bot. Gaz.</source>
               <volume>149</volume>
               <year>1988</year>
               <page-range>92–100</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib45">
            <label>[45]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pocock</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A comparative ultrastructural study of endophytic basidiomycetes in the parasitic achlorophyllous hepatic <italic>Cryptothallus mirabilis</italic> and the closely related allied photosynthetic species <italic>Aneura pinguis</italic> (Metzgeriales)</article-title>
               <source>Can. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>71</volume>
               <year>1993</year>
               <page-range>666–679</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib46">
            <label>[46]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Marks</surname>
                  <given-names>G.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Causal morphology and evolution of mycorrhizas</article-title>
               <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source>
               <volume>35</volume>
               <year>1991</year>
               <page-range>89–104</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib47">
            <label>[47]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Morton</surname>
                  <given-names>J.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Benny</surname>
                  <given-names>G.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Revised classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Zygomycetes): a new order, Glomales</article-title>
               <source>Mycotaxon</source>
               <volume>37</volume>
               <year>1990</year>
               <page-range>471–491</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib48">
            <label>[48]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Mosse</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bowen</surname>
                  <given-names>G.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A key to the recognition of some <italic>Endogone</italic> spore types</article-title>
               <source>Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.</source>
               <volume>51</volume>
               <year>1968</year>
               <page-range>469–483</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib49">
            <label>[49]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Moyersoen</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>
                  <italic>Pakaraimaea dipterocarpacea</italic> is ectomycorrhizal indicating an ancient Gondwanaland origin for the ectomycorrhizal habit in Dipterocarpaceae</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>172</volume>
               <year>2006</year>
               <page-range>753–762</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib50">
            <label>[50]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Muthukumar</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Udaiyan</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizas in cycads of southern India</article-title>
               <source>Mycorrhiza</source>
               <volume>12</volume>
               <issue>4</issue>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>213–217</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib51">
            <label>[51]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Nicolson</surname>
                  <given-names>T.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Evolution of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sanders</surname>
                  <given-names>F.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Mosse</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tinkers</surname>
                  <given-names>P.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Endomycorrhizas</article-title>
               <year>1975</year>
               <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>25–34</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib52">
            <label>[52]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Nicolson</surname>
                  <given-names>T.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gerdemann</surname>
                  <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizal <italic>Endogone</italic> species</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia</source>
               <volume>60</volume>
               <year>1968</year>
               <page-range>313–325</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib53">
            <label>[53]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Onguene</surname>
                  <given-names>N.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kuyper</surname>
                  <given-names>T.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizal associations in the rain forest of South Cameroon</article-title>
               <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source>
               <volume>140</volume>
               <year>2001</year>
               <page-range>277–287</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib54">
            <label>[54]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Osborn</surname>
                  <given-names>T.G.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The lateral roots of <italic>Amyelon radicans</italic> Will. and their mycorrhiza</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Bot.</source>
               <volume>23</volume>
               <year>1909</year>
               <page-range>603–611</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib55">
            <label>[55]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Peterson</surname>
                  <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Howarth</surname>
                  <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Whittier</surname>
                  <given-names>D.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Interactions between a fungal endophyte and gametophyte cells in <italic>Psilotum nudum</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Can. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>59</volume>
               <year>1981</year>
               <page-range>711–720</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib56">
            <label>[56]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Peyronel</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Fructification de l’endophyte à arbuscules et à vésicules des mycorhizes endotrophes</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr.</source>
               <volume>39</volume>
               <year>1923</year>
               <page-range>119–126</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib57">
            <label>[57]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Peyronel</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fassi</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fontana</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Trappe</surname>
                  <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Terminology of mycorrhizae</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia</source>
               <volume>61</volume>
               <year>1969</year>
               <page-range>410–411</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib58">
            <label>[58]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Phipps</surname>
                  <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mixed arbuscular mycorrhizae from the Triassic of Antarctica</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia</source>
               <volume>88</volume>
               <issue>5</issue>
               <year>1996</year>
               <page-range>707–714</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib59">
            <label>[59]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pirozynski</surname>
                  <given-names>K.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Malloch</surname>
                  <given-names>D.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The origin of land plants: a matter of mycotrophism</article-title>
               <source>Biosystems</source>
               <volume>6</volume>
               <year>1975</year>
               <page-range>153–164</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib60">
            <label>[60]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pryer</surname>
                  <given-names>K.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schuettpelz</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Wolf</surname>
                  <given-names>P.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Scheinder</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>A.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cranfill</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Phylogeny and evolution of ferns (monilophytes) with a focus on the early leptosporangiate divergences</article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>91</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>1582–1598</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib61">
            <label>[61]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Read</surname>
                  <given-names>D.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Duckett</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Francis</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ligrone</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Russell</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Symbiotic fungal associations in « lower » land plants</article-title>
               <source>Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.</source>
               <volume>355</volume>
               <year>2000</year>
               <page-range>815–831</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib62">
            <label>[62]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Redecker</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Molecular identification and phylogeny of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>
               <source>Plant Soil</source>
               <volume>244</volume>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>67–73</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib63">
            <label>[63]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Remy</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hass</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kerp</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Four hundred million year old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</article-title>
               <source>Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA</source>
               <volume>91</volume>
               <year>1994</year>
               <page-range>11841–11843</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib64">
            <label>[64]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Renzaglia</surname>
                  <given-names>K.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A comparative morphology and developmental anatomy of the Anthocerotophyta</article-title>
               <source>J. Hattori Bot. Lab.</source>
               <volume>44</volume>
               <year>1978</year>
               <page-range>31–90</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib65">
            <label>[65]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Russell</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bulman</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The liverworth <italic>Marchantia foliacea</italic> forms a specialized symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the genus <italic>Glomus</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>165</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>567–579</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib66">
            <label>[66]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmid</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Oberwinkler</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhiza-like interaction between the achlorophyllous gametophyte of <italic>Lycopodium clavatum</italic> L. and its fungal endophyte studied by light and electron microscopy</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>124</volume>
               <year>1993</year>
               <page-range>69–81</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib67">
            <label>[67]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmid</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Oberwinkler</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Light and electron microscopy of the host-fungus interaction in the achlorophyllous gametophyte of <italic>Botrychium lunaria</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Can. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>72</volume>
               <year>1994</year>
               <page-range>182–188</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib68">
            <label>[68]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmid</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Oberwinkler</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A light and electron-microscope study on a vesicular-arbuscular host-fungus interaction in gametophytes and young sporophytes of the Gleicheniaceae (Filicales)</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>129</volume>
               <year>1995</year>
               <page-range>317–324</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib69">
            <label>[69]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmid</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmid</surname>
                  <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Fossil history of the Orchidaceae</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Arditti</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Orchid biology : reviews and perspectives I</article-title>
               <year>1977</year>
               <publisher-name>Cornell University Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>25–46</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib70">
            <label>[70]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Schüßler</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Wolf</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>
                  <italic>Geosiphon pyriformis</italic>-a glomeromycotan soil fungus forming endosymbiosis with cyanobacteria</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Declerck</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fortin</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>In vitro culture of mycorrhizas</article-title>
               <year>2005</year>
               <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>271–289</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib71">
            <label>[71]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Schüßler</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schwarzott</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Walker</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution</article-title>
               <source>Mycol. Res</source>
               <volume>105</volume>
               <year>2001</year>
               <page-range>1413–1421</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib72">
            <label>[72]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Selosse</surname>
                  <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Are liverworts imitating mycorrhizas?</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>165</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>345–349</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib73">
            <label>[73]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>F.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>S.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Structural diversity in (vesicular) arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>137</volume>
               <year>1997</year>
               <page-range>373–388</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib74">
            <label>[74]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>S.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Read</surname>
                  <given-names>D.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Mycorrhizal symbiosis</source>
               <year>1997</year>
               <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib75">
            <label>[75]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>St John</surname>
                  <given-names>T.V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Root size, root hairs and mycorrhizal infection: a re-examination of Baylis's hypothesis with tropical trees</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>84</volume>
               <year>1980</year>
               <page-range>483–487</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib76">
            <label>[76]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Stockey</surname>
                  <given-names>R.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rothwell</surname>
                  <given-names>G.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Addy</surname>
                  <given-names>H.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Currah</surname>
                  <given-names>R.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mycorrhizal association of the extinct conifer <italic>Metasequoia milleri</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Mycol. Res.</source>
               <volume>105</volume>
               <issue>2</issue>
               <year>2001</year>
               <page-range>202–205</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib77">
            <label>[77]</label>
            <mixed-citation>D.G. Strullu, Les Mycorhizes, Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin-Stuttgart, 1985.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib78">
            <label>[78]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Les mycorhizes des arbres et plantes cultivées</source>
               <year>1991</year>
               <publisher-name>Tec &amp; Doc Lavoisier</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib79">
            <label>[79]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gourret</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Garrec</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Microanalyse des granules vacuolaires des ectomycorhizes, endomycorhizes et endomycothalles</article-title>
               <source>Physiol. Veg.</source>
               <volume>19</volume>
               <year>1981</year>
               <page-range>367–378</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib80">
            <label>[80]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gourret</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Garrec</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fourcy</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Ultrastructure and electron-probe microanalysis of the metachromatic vacuolar granules occurring in Taxus mycorrhizas</article-title>
               <source>New Phytol.</source>
               <volume>87</volume>
               <year>1981</year>
               <page-range>537–545</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib81">
            <label>[81]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Strullu</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Frenot</surname>
                  <given-names>Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Maurice</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gloaguen</surname>
                  <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Plenchette</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Première contribution à l’étude des mycorhizes des îles Kerguelen</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. III</source>
               <volume>322</volume>
               <year>1999</year>
               <page-range>771–777</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib82">
            <label>[82]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Stubblefield</surname>
                  <given-names>S.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Banks</surname>
                  <given-names>H.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Fungal remains in the Devonian trimerophyte <italic>Psilophyton dawsonii</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>70</volume>
               <year>1983</year>
               <page-range>1258–1261</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib83">
            <label>[83]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Stubblefield</surname>
                  <given-names>S.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Trappe</surname>
                  <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae from the Triassic of Antarctica</article-title>
               <source>Am. J. Bot.</source>
               <volume>74</volume>
               <issue>12</issue>
               <year>1987</year>
               <page-range>1904–1911</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib84">
            <label>[84]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Stubblefield</surname>
                  <given-names>S.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Trappe J.M, Fossil mycorrhizae: a case for symbiosis</article-title>
               <source>Science</source>
               <volume>237</volume>
               <year>1987</year>
               <page-range>59–60</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib85">
            <label>[85]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Remy</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Hass</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kerp</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Fossil arbuscular mycorrhizae from the Early Devonian</article-title>
               <source>Mycologia</source>
               <volume>87</volume>
               <year>1995</year>
               <page-range>560–573</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib86">
            <label>[86]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Wagner</surname>
                  <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Taylor</surname>
                  <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Evidence for endomycorrhizae in Pennsylvanian age plant fossils</article-title>
               <source>Science</source>
               <volume>212</volume>
               <year>1981</year>
               <page-range>562–563</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib87">
            <label>[87]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Weiss</surname>
                  <given-names>F.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A mycorrhiza from the Lower Coal Measures</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Bot.</source>
               <volume>18</volume>
               <year>1904</year>
               <page-range>255–266</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib88">
            <label>[88]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Wilde</surname>
                  <given-names>S.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lafond</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Symbiotrophy of lignophytes and fungi: its terminology and conceptual difficulties</article-title>
               <source>Bot. Rev.</source>
               <volume>33</volume>
               <year>1967</year>
               <page-range>99–104</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib89">
            <label>[89]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Zhao</surname>
                  <given-names>Z.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The arbuscular mycorrhizas of pteridophytes in Yunnan, southwestern China: evolutionary interpretations</article-title>
               <source>Mycorrhiza</source>
               <volume>10</volume>
               <year>2000</year>
               <page-range>145–149</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib90">
            <label>[90]</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Zimmermann</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Paläobotanische und phylogenetische Beiträge 1–5</article-title>
               <source>Palaeobiologica</source>
               <volume>5</volume>
               <year>1933</year>
               <page-range>321–348</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
   <floats-group>
      <fig id="fig1">
         <label>Fig. 1</label>
         <caption>
            <p>Paramycorrhizae and eumycorrhizae in living plants. Left: paramycorrhizae represented by endomycothalli in <italic>Pellia epiphylla</italic> showing the colonization by a glomeromycotan fungus. Ultrastructural aspects of the arbuscules in a cortical cell containing plastids with grana (detail of Fig. 35 <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>). Scale bar = 3 μm. Right: eumycorrhizae showing the penetration of a symbiotic fungus into a cortical root cell of <italic>Taxus baccata</italic>. Ultrastructural aspects of the arbuscules surrounded by a dual apoplast and the host plasmalemma (detail of Fig. 51 <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>). Scale bar = 1 μm.</p>
            <p>Fig. 1. Paramycorhizes et eumycorhizes chez les plantes actuelles. À gauche : paramycorhizes représentées par des endomycothalles chez <italic>Pellia epiphylla,</italic> montrant la colonisation par un gloméromycète. Ultrastructure des arbuscules visibles dans une cellule corticale montrant des plastes à grana (détail de la Fig. 35 <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>). Barre d’échelle = 3 μm. À droite : eumycorhizes montrant la pénétration du champignon symbiotique dans les cellules racinaires de <italic>Taxus baccata</italic>. Ultrastructure des arbuscules entourés par un apoplaste mixte et le plasmalemme de la cellule-hôte (détail de la Fig. 51 <xref rid="bib77" ref-type="bibr">[77]</xref>). Barre d’échelle = 1,5 μm.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr1.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig2">
         <label>Fig. 2</label>
         <caption>
            <p>The three basic types of mycorrhizae.</p>
            <p>Fig. 2. Les trois principaux types de mycorhizes.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr2.jc3"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig3">
         <label>Fig. 3</label>
         <caption>
            <p>Phylogenetic tree of the Embryophytes. Progymnosperms: Aneurophytales and Archaeopteridales; Pteridosperms 1: Hydrasperman Pteridosperms, Medullosales and Callistophytales; Pteridosperms 2: Peltaspermales; Pteridosperms 3: Glossopteridales, Benettitales and Caytoniales.</p>
            <p>Fig. 3. Arbre phylogénétique des embryophytes. Progymnospermes : Aneurophytales et Archaeoptéridales ; Ptéridospermes 1 : Ptéridospermes hydraspermiennes, Médullosales and Callistophytales ; Ptéridospermes 2 : Peltaspermales ; Ptéridospermes 3 : Glossoptéridales, Benettitales et Caytoniales.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr3.jc3"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig4">
         <label>Fig. 4</label>
         <caption>
            <p>Mycorrhizal status of the embryophytes (including fossil and living clades). Orange: paramycorrhizae; green: eumycorrhizae; purple: awaiting further investigation; underlined: fossil members; AM = arbuscular mycorrhizae; NN = non-mycorrhizal; ECM = ectomycorrhizae; Orchid/Ericoid M = Orchid/Ericoid mycorrhizae.</p>
            <p>Fig. 4 Statut mycorhizien des embryophytes (regroupant les clades fossiles et actuels). En orange : paramycorhizes ; en vert : eumycorrhizes ; en violet : cas demandant à être réétudiés ; les clades, genres et espèces fossiles sont soulignés ; AM = mycorhizes à arbuscules ; NN = non mycorhizien ; ECM = ectomycorhizes ; Orchid/ericoid M = mycorhizes de type Orchidaceae/Ericales.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr4.jc3"/>
      </fig>
   </floats-group>
</article>